US Ranks #5 in Global Leadership Study; Faces Decline as Mexico and Brazil Poised to Move Ahead
Press release from the issuing company
Thursday, September 6th, 2012
SHL, the global leader in talent measurement solutions, today announced the release of its first Global Leadership study, providing a worldwide view of leadership potential. The study identifies the top 251 countries with the greatest supply of potential leaders relative to its workforce, based on the analysis of over a million people from SHL's global Talent Analytics database. While the US currently ranks 5th in the world in leadership potential today, the nation risks a declining position as corporate globalization outpaces leadership identification and development programs, at home and abroad.
According to the study, the landscape of leadership potential changes significantly when analyzing the supply of leadership talent for tomorrow *. Mexico, Turkey, Egypt, Switzerland, and Brazil have the greatest source of potential future leaders. In contrast, today's top ranked countries such as the UK drops 18 places to fall out of the top 20 and Hong Kong falls from pole position to 20th, while Mexico and Brazil jump 19 and 21 places respectively, with Mexico topping the table.
"While the study suggests a moderate slide in US rank from 5 today to 8 tomorrow – the bigger issue is the risk of falling into a steady declining trend in our supply of leaders, especially as domestic-based companies continue to expand internationally to compete in the global economy," explained Caroline Paxman, President of the Americas for SHL. "In order to survive, no less grow, US companies need to employ programs to better identify leaders of the future – and become more competent in analyzing and sourcing international talent pools to find them."
"There is a looming leadership crisis in many economies today. The shortages of key skills remains a challenge for the majority of global organizations we study, and companies cannot hire their way out of this deficit," said Mollie Lombardi, Research Director, HCM at Aberdeen Group. "Organizations must focus on finding and developing future leaders, and 52% of Best-in-Class organizations in our latest assessments study cite using objective assessment data to identify high-potential talent and build development plans as a top strategy."
SHL offers five guidelines to cultivating leadership success across an organization:
- Make It a Priority: Acknowledge the risk, and put a formal action plan in place. Start by clearly defining the behaviors and skills which make a successful leader in your organization.
- Look Beyond Performance: Have a full picture of the leadership potential across your organization and don't restrict that view to only those you think are high potential. Do not confuse ambition with ability.
- Replace Subjectivity with Objectivity: Gut instinct won't do. Using scientific data, benchmark your people against competitor talent and identify leadership shortages to avoid succession risk.
- Be Pragmatic & Proactive: Don't wait for yearly review cycles, instead, employ development interventions at the point-of-pain with individual employees or across departments. This includes where and when to spend learning and development budgets throughout the company.
- Cast a Wider Net: Take a global view of where your leadership talent is located and be prepared to use creative strategies to source talent across borders to fill leadership gaps.
Top 25 countries with leadership potential today and tomorrow
|
Supply of leadership potential as a % of population: Top 25 countries |
|||||
|
Ranking |
Effective Leaders Today |
Potential Leaders of Tomorrow |
Ranking change between leaders for today and leaders for tomorrow |
||
|
1-25 |
Country |
% |
Country |
% |
+ or - |
|
1 |
Hong Kong |
14 % |
Mexico |
54% |
+21 |
|
2 |
Germany |
13% |
Turkey |
50% |
+16 |
|
3 |
United Kingdom |
10% |
Egypt |
44% |
New entry** |
|
4 |
Australia* |
10 % |
Switzerland |
43% |
+2 |
|
5 |
United States |
10% |
Brazil |
42% |
+19 |
|
6 |
Switzerland |
10% |
India |
41% |
New entry |
|
7 |
Canada |
10% |
Italy |
41% |
+12 |
|
8 |
Japan* |
9% |
United States |
41% |
-3 |
|
9 |
Singapore* |
9% |
Germany |
40% |
-7 |
|
10 |
New Zealand* |
8% |
Netherlands |
40% |
New entry |
|
11 |
Sweden |
7% |
China (Taiwan) |
39% |
+1 |
|
12 |
China (Taiwan) * |
7% |
United Arab Emirates |
39% |
+9 |
|
13 |
France* |
7% |
Denmark |
39% |
+10 |
|
14 |
Thailand* |
7.% |
Sweden |
37% |
-3 |
|
15 |
Finland* |
7% |
Portugal |
37% |
New entry |
|
16 |
Belgium* |
7% |
Russia |
37% |
New entry |
|
17 |
Spain |
6% |
Spain |
37% |
No change |
|
18 |
Turkey |
6% |
Ireland |
37% |
New entry |
|
19 |
Italy |
6% |
Indonesia |
37% |
New entry |
|
20 |
South Africa* |
6% |
China (Hong Kong) |
37% |
-19 |
|
21 |
United Arab Emirates |
6% |
United Kingdom |
37% |
-18 |
|
22 |
Mexico |
6% |
Norway |
36% |
+3 |
|
23 |
Denmark |
5% |
Poland |
35% |
New entry |
|
24 |
Brazil |
5% |
Canada |
35% |
-17 |
|
25 |
Norway |
5% |
China (Mainland) |
34% |
New entry |
*Indicates those counties ranked in the top 25 leaders today but not listed in the top 25 for leadership potential tomorrow.


